This weekend the Cute Little Red-Headed Girlfriend and I sat down to watch the first episode of Spartacus: Blood and Sand, the new series from cable station Starz (you can watch episode one online here). We've been anticipating the show's debut for some time now because of Lucy Lawless's involvement. Because the hype machine for this series has been cranked very high as of late, it was a relief to finally have the episode in front of us so we could judge the program for ourselves.

In addition to all the publicity about the show's bloodiness, sex and the nudity, there have been several "false leads" about the series that had us wondering what Spartacus would really be like. To begin with, Spartacus the TV show isn't a remake of Spartacus the 1960 movie, though it took awhile for us to sort that out. Many of the character names are the same, yet the characters themselves differ. The storylines are distinct as well.

More confusion came from parallels to the movie 300, and many TV critics compared and contrasted Spartacus and 300 in early reviews. This concerned me, as I found 300 to be irredeemably racist and have assigned it a top spot on my list of the worst movies I've ever seen.

I do think 300 has some value as a teaching tool; it certainly deserves a place on any curriculuum addressing the issue of fascist aesthetics. Spartacus's resemblance to 300 is more conceptual, as in "it's 300's CGI effects meets Rome's plotting," rather than a real attempt to emulate that loathsome movie.

Spartacus's first episode begins with a clash between the Thracian people and the army of Rome, starting with the Thracians' perspective. Rome demands that the Thracians join with their army to repel approaching enemy forces. The man who we will later know as Spartacus (played by Andy Whitfield) steps forward to bargain with the Roman representative on behalf of Thrace.

The Thracians then enter into an uneasy alliance with the Romans. The Thracian fighters resent the Romans because they are made to do most of the fighting, and we learn that Spartacus pines for his wife, Sura (Erin Cummings), back home. Before long, the Romans break their agreement with the Thracians, leading to a fight that leaves several of the Thracians, including Spartacus, captive and in chains.

Some critics have argued that Spartacus's storyline bears a close resemblance to Gladiator. Perhaps in outline. But after having seen the first episode, I believe the film that has inspired Spartacus is Carrie. When I saw the first battle scene where the Thracian fighters' bodies are streaked with blood and big clots of blood are matting down their hair, my mind immediately went to the image of Sissy Spacek covered in a bucket of blood.

A bloody fight in the snow

As men hacked off enemy limbs with fierce abandon, a thick splotch of blood splattered and covered a third of the screen. I'm sure the effect the show was going for was something hypermale and ultraviolent but I thought it was a neat visual proof that when you push the representation of masculinity too far you sometimes wind up producing its exact opposite. The menstruality of it all made me howl with laughter.

I'm a fan of video and tabletop strategy games, so I enjoyed seeing the fight scenes I mostly didn't get to see in Rome. I especially liked the detail shown on the armour and weaponry in the fight scenes. I was also happy to see a woman, Sura, fighting capably with a sword in the first episode. I wasn't expecting to see a woman fighting but I hope it continues.

Although Spartacus is being touted for its extensive use of CGI, I thought one of the most effective sequences was a fast-moving series of shots representing the circumstances of Spartacus's captivity. It was an efficient way to move the story along, but the images were powerful and precise in evoking horror.

Andy Whitfield brings intensity to his role as Spartacus, as well as a fine body for those men and women who appreciate such things. I point you in the direction of Brent Hartinger's review on AfterElton.com for a thorough loincloth report and further thoughts on the show from a gay male's perspective.

As a lesbian, my sights are solidly focused on the presence of Lucy Lawless in the cast playing the sexually ravenous Roman Lucretia. I experienced a mixed jumble of feelings when I first heard Lawless would be appearing in the series. I was thrilled to hear Lucy Lawless would be on TV again regularly, but ambivalent about the role. It seems like a cruel irony that this beneficent idol of lesbians everywhere is returning to the screen in a role where she'll be featured in the buff shagging one male gladiator after another. Truthfully, it makes one question God's intent.

Lawless did not appear much in the first episode, so I have yet to resolve my feelings one way or another. But her role sounds like a good one, and hopefully it will wind up being one more reason--along with the great fighting and the Roman setting--for me to continue watching and enjoying Spartacus.

Thanks to MaryD of AUSXIP for allowing me to use an HD screencap from Episode 1 found on her site.


Great review, T. I like your insight. Especially the menstrual blood. It is exciting and staggering at the same time to have such a dichotomy revealed. Men do relish so much in the blood lust that defines their masculinity. But mention a woman's monthly cycle, and they all run for the hills like a bunch of squeamish sheltered little girls. "Oooo, disgusting. Too much information. Dirty."

I don't get it but I do. And it's about the fantasy, and the fallacy that defines what a man is in this society, the gross cartoonish deformed image - much in the way, women's femininity is defined in this distorted mutation that appeals to men's crude, vulgar tastes in women that addresses men's view of women which is - let's call a spade a spade here - ignorant, bigoted and prejudiced. Simply to call it sexist is not enough. But it's as bad and as detrimental as any racist or antisemitic view. In fact, it is worse, because it encompasses more than half the fucken human population. The human population that are our mothers, our sisters and our daughters.

I am sorry, but that was a bit of a rant. I get very upset when I see our society celebrating this darkness in the human soul, as if it were something to nourish, when, in fact, it keeps us rooted to repeating the same violence over and over again and while our technology gets better, and we become more efficient at killing and controlling people, *we* don't get any better.

Wonderful review! I agree, there was not enough Luce in the first episode. There is more of her in the second one. MUCH MORE! The first episode was, I assume was to get everyone familiar with the characters, and establish back story.

I thought the episode was great. I love ancient Rome and all that ancient Rome is. I am looking forward to the rest of the episodes. Been waiting for this show for 15 years!


I'm fairly certain that you'll be the only reviewer of this new series to invoke "Carrie" as a reference point. But, that's why I love you. My only disappointment was no references to Nixon. :)

Recent Comments

  • Joe G.: I'm fairly certain that you'll be the only reviewer of read more
  • Charis xX: Wonderful review! I agree, there was not enough Luce in read more
  • the Cute-Little-Red-Headed-Girlfriend: Great review, T. I like your insight. Especially the menstrual read more